STRICT LIABILITY

Strict liability may be a theory that imposes an obligation for damages or injuries, notwithstanding the one that was found strictly liable failed to act with fault or negligence. It's a legal philosophy that holds a celebration accountable for their actions or product, while not the litigator has to prove negligence or fault. Once somebody partakes in ultra-hazardous activities like keeping wild animals, victimizing explosives or creating a defective product, then they will be command liable if some other person is harmed.

Even if the litigant took necessary precautions and followed safety needs, strict liability crimes are distinctive therein they'd still hold the litigant accountable. Because of the character of the activity, the litigant ought to be able to foresee that an individual may well be injured by it.

Strict Liability As Applied to criminal law

In legal code, strict liability is mostly restricted to minor offences. legal code classifies strict liability joined of 5 attainable mentes reae (mental states) that a litigant could have in pursuit of the crime. the opposite four are "acting wittingly," "acting intentionally," "acting with foolhardiness," and "acting with negligence." The preparation of strict liability usually ends up in a lot of lenient punishments than the opposite four mentes reae. Usually, in legal code, the defendant's awareness of what he's doing wouldn't negate a strict liability preparation (for example, having medication can usually end in criminal liability, despite whether or not the litigant is aware that he has the drugs). 

What Must the Plaintiff Prove to Win?

To win a strict liability causa, the litigator should show the following:

•The plaintiff should show proof of injury;

•The plaintiff should prove that the defendant’s actions or product caused the injury; and

•The plaintiff should show that the litigant’s activities were immoderately risky or that the defendant had management over the merchandise

Strict Liability As Applied to tort law 

In tort law, there are two broad classes of activities that a litigator is also commanded strictly liable - possession of bound animals and abnormally dangerous activities. To boot, within the space of torts referred to as product liability, there's a sub-category referred to as strict product liability that applies once a defective product that associate degree acceptable litigant holds responsibility causes injury to associate acceptable degree litigator.